The History of "The Bachelor Tax" ArticleSpectrum.com

Home | Privacy Policy | Contact Us

	Psychology
	Stress Management
	Cooking
	Travel Tips
	Science
	Dependency
	Language
	Relationships
	Happiness
	Homeschooling
	Beauty
	Destinations
	Parenting
	K-12 Education
	History

VIEW ALL CATEGORIES

Welcome to ArticleSpectrum.com!

Articles » Society » Marriage

The History of "The Bachelor Tax"

By: admin

In the 1800s, most women remained in their parents' households until they married. Young ladies who were single were known as "spinsters"; middle aged and older women who remained unmarried were dubbed "old maids." Many in the older generation fretted about the existence of too many bachelors, spinsters and old maids. This fretting led to ideas on how to create a financial incentive for young men to marry and have children.

In 1821, Missouri became the first state to pass a tax on bachelors -- taxing unmarried males 21 and older $1 a year. Five years later, a Tennessee State Senator named Lewis Reneau of Sevier County proposed a much higher bachelor tax. He favored an annual tax of 25% on the estate of any young man who had not yet taken a wife. "All men who enjoy the liberty and civilized life should conform themselves to the customs by which these blessings are secured," the bill declared. Money raised from the tax would be distributed to the unmarried women in the county in which it was collected. Reneau's bill did not pass, and other bachelor tax bills were proposed, and rejected, in Tennessee in 1855, 1875, 1885 and 1895.

By the turn of the century, the bachelor tax was a frequent topic of discussion across the country. In 1907, the New York Herald reported that at least seven states -- Illinois, Missouri, Massachusetts, Texas, Wisconsin, Indiana and Iowa -- were contemplating some version of a tax on bachelors. "The preamble of the (Iowa) bill declares unmarried men are a menace to society; that the morals of the larger cities are degenerating owing to them," reported the Herald (which makes one wonder, how large were the cities in Iowa in 1907, and just how degenerate could they have been?).

It appears the last Tennessee state lawmaker who proposed a bachelor tax was Sen. Harry J. Lovelace of Davidson County, in 1939. "It is the duty of every man to marry and support a wife," he said. "If one refuses to assume this obligation, then he should be made to contribute to the support of women left unmarried because he and others like him shun wedlock."

Lovelace's bill didn't get a lot of votes but did get attention. The Knoxville News Sentinel published several letters about this proposal, including:

- "If there were such a tax, how could a girl be sure her husband hadn't married her just to avoid paying the tax?" asked George Williams of Morristown, Tenn.

- "To tax the bachelor would make celibacy seem like a luxury, when in reality it is a handicap and a hardship. To tax the bachelor would be an insult to the usefulness of womankind!" wrote Mrs. Andrew Jones of Knoxville.

- "A great number of males are caught every year and I think that the few who manage to keep clear should be given a special medal by our state to an outstanding achievement," said Elbert Lyle of Knoxville.

Sen. Lovelace's bill failed like all the bachelor tax proposals before his. But it would have been interesting to see of Tenn. Gov. Prentice Cooper -- a bachelor himself -- would have signed the bill had it made it to his desk.

When contemplating this topic, one's first reaction might be to dismiss the "bachelor tax" as an old-fashioned idea that the country outgrew after women entered the workforce. However, consider today's IRS income tax code. Today, couples receive tax advantages when they marry and more tax advantages when they have children. We don't really think of this system as a tax on bachelors, but it kind of is. So in some ways, we do have an unspoken "bachelor tax" today.

Maybe Sen. Reneau of Sevier County wasn't so crazy after all.

- Bill Carey

Total Views : 266 Word Count Appx. : 622

See All articles From Author